Home / Knowledge / Choosing a kraft paper weight
Choosing a kraft paper weight
Grammage sets both the protection and the running cost, and heavier is not automatically better.
Kraft for converting is specified by grammage, and the working range for cushioning applications spans a factor of two or more. Light paper expands more readily, produces more volume per kilogram and costs less per square metre. Heavy paper resists crushing better and survives more handling.
The instinct is to specify heavy paper for protection, and it is often wrong. Cushioning works by deforming; a paper stiff enough to resist deformation transmits the impact to the product instead of absorbing it. For light goods, lighter paper is not a compromise but the correct answer.
Where heavy paper earns its cost is in abrasion and repeated handling: a wrap that will be moved several times, a pallet interleaf that takes load, or any application where the material must survive the journey rather than only the first drop.
The practical method is to test rather than calculate. Run the product through the packing process with two grammages and drop it. This is a cheap experiment and it settles a question that specification sheets cannot.
Specifications
| Light paper | More volume per kilogram, expands readily |
|---|---|
| Heavy paper | Resists crushing and abrasion |
| Common error | Specifying heavy for light goods |
| The method | Test two grammages and drop the pack |
Related Products
How honeycomb paper works
A slit pattern turns a flat sheet into a three dimensional cell structure, and the geometry does the cushioning.
Honeycomb, fanfold or crinkle
Three paper formats that answer three different packing problems, and are not interchangeable.
Sizing a paper converting line
Machine capacity is easy to over-buy, and the constraint is usually the packing bench rather than the converter.
Tell us your roll width
Send the roll width you buy, the material you want to produce and your daily output, and we will configure a machine around them rather than quoting a fixed model.