Home / Knowledge / What reliability testing before tooling actually catches
What reliability testing before tooling actually catches
The faults worth catching are thermal and mechanical, and both are cheap to fix in a prototype and expensive to fix in steel.
Thermal faults come first: hot spots on a plate, a housing that gets uncomfortably warm at the grip, a thermal cutout that trips in normal use because the sensor sits in the wrong place. All three are geometry problems, and geometry is what a mould fixes permanently.
Mechanical faults follow: hinge feel that degrades after a few thousand cycles, a cord that fatigues at the strain relief, a swivel that develops play. These show up on a flex or cycle rig, not in a functional check.
Both categories cost very little to correct while the design is a prototype and a great deal once the mould exists in steel. That is the entire argument for spending roughly thirty days on validation before tooling rather than discovering the same faults through warranty returns.
Specifications
| Thermal faults | Hot spots, warm grip, badly placed cutout sensor |
|---|---|
| Mechanical faults | Hinge wear, cord fatigue, swivel play |
| Window | Roughly 30 days, before tooling is cut |
Related Products
Why heat-up time and recovery decide a styling tool
Users do not measure plate temperature, they count passes, and pass count is set by recovery rather than by peak temperature.
How ODM development differs from catalogue sourcing
Catalogue sourcing buys a product that already exists; ODM buys a product designed against your market and price point.
Specifying a hair dryer that people keep using
Weight balance, noise and cord exit decide repeat use far more than wattage does.
Tell us what you want to launch
Send the concept, the target market and the price point. Development risk is settled in roughly thirty days, before any tooling is cut.